Sunday, October 28, 2012

Third Times a Charm, Mr. Steinbeck

Cannery Row, as it turns out, was breath of fresh air in comparison to the withered husk of a plot that was Grapes of Wrath.  Additionally, it wasn't a sad ending like Of Mice and Men. 
1.It's a local story about a community in Monterey, specifically those living on Cannery Row.  The narrative fulfills the author's purpose by avoiding a tightly structured plot and creating many stories surrounding the collective plot.  Essentially, a group of "bums" try to make a patriarch's life better and along the way we see the natural evolution of a community.
2. The theme of the novel was intention.  Whether it was the brothel's bouncer intending to defend the girls from a lush and accidentally breaking his spine or the guys' intent to throw a party for Doc and ruining his home before he even arrived.
3. I'm happy to report that the tone of this novel didn't make me want to put myself on suicide watch like the story of the Joads.  Nevertheless, there was a serious air no matter what was happening.

  • " The party was slipping away in sweet sadness."  
  • " He wondered what a beer milkshake would taste like."
  • " His old lady hits him.  But I bet you when Gay's away from her three days, he gets it figured out that it's his fault and he goes back to make it up to her."


4.Here's a cool aside.  I found this book in the trashcan outside of room 607 along with a couple other classics.  It's 1945 copy from the Viking press and is " IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL WAR PRODUCTION BOARD CONSERVATION ORDERS." Cool stuff dawg.

  • " Cannery Row in Monterey in California is a poem, a stink, a grating noise, a qualilty of light, a tone, a habit, a nostalgia, a dream." Metaphor is a useful to say things without being too articulate.  Still he lets it flow with a sequence of them.
  • " 'I love you,' he said one afternoon. ' Oh, I love you.'" Ambiguity is powerful when there is a conversation between two me.  I don't know who he was that made this statement.  That mystery definitely got me to probing the characters more on their emotional capacity.  
  • " At Lee Chong's he got him a new pair of overalls and a striped sweater and Frankie became his slave."  Diction.  Did Frankie make himself a hyper-devoted employee? Or did he become an indentured servant?
  • Another similarity this book holds with Of Mice and Men is that characteristic of post-modernism that is the not-necessarily intertwined multitude of plot lines.
  • The genre being post-modern, you would expect an omniscient narrator, and in this novel, you would find one." Fire did not break out, and while no rent was ever paid, if the tenants ever had any money, and quite often they did have, it never occurred to them to spend it any place except at Lee Chong's grocery."
  • Near the end of the book, Steinbeck writes out a poem in verse and instantly, the mood is changed to a comfort of existence that you could find in a home design catalog featuring artfully cluttered rooms.
  • I'm not sure epigrams are used for anything else but in this novel, they highlighted the theme at a particular point of the plot and there were quite a few.  My favorite: "The man doesn't live who doesn't have to look at a parade."
  • One could also interpret the zeitgeist of the story through the authors lax use of the word "oriental".  He used it to describe almost all the emotions the Chong family collectively displayed.  
  • The subtle metonymy of replacing the people of Cannery Row with only the name of the community emphasizes the idea that they all belong to and characterize the place just as much as its geography or climate.
  • One motif I didn't notice until now is the puppy Mack and his crew pick up while trying to get on Doc's good side.  At the outset of the dog's life in the story, she is uncontrolled and eventually becomes sick.  The relationship between the men and Doc is in the same state of disrepair after the failed attempt to create a party for Doc.  After he is called upon to see how the dog can get better, we see the relationship and the dog's health improve and life is brought back to the community as well.
1. " He was twenty-six-dark-haired and pleasant, strong, willing, and loyal." Had he just been described as a question-asker and non-listener, I would have written him off as a rude and insincere character.  His youth allowed me to understand that his life had been hard and that there was a background to his personality I didn't have to learn to understand.  An example of indirect characterization I saw was when the crew happened upon the owner of the land where they were hunting frogs.  He was initially guarded but opened his home and pantry to the men when they showed kindness.  He only offered them help and gratitude which made me sad to consider the life the man led while nobody else was around.
2. The syntax does not change through the story but the diction does when the more learned or respectable characters are showcased.  It becomes less colloquial while retaining its Steinbeck qualities.
3. I would venture to say that there was not an individual protagonist but that the entire community was it.  Harping on this cord, I say the community was static overall.  We reached  a homeostasis by the end of the book.  One that could've been found at the beginning of Cannery Row's description also.  By definition, the community was rounded.  There was compassion and indifference.  There was willingness to share and their was mystery as well, especially in the old chinaman who came flopping up from the beach everyday.  
4.  After the book, I sympathized immensely with Doc.  He was the kind of person who couldn't imagine asking a question and not wanting the answer.  I am also that kind of person.  " That was the way with Doc.  He never asked unless he wanted to know and he could not conceive of the the brain that would ask without wanting to know."


Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Tools that Change the Way We Think


"Back in 2004, I asked [Google founders] Page and Brin what they saw as the future of Google search. 'It will be included in people's brains,' said Page. 'When you think about something and don't really know much about it, you will automatically get information.'

'That's true,' said Brin. 'Ultimately I view Google as a way to augment your brain with the knowledge of the world. Right now you go into your computer and type a phrase, but you can imagine that it could be easier in the future, that you can have just devices you talk into, or you can have computers that pay attention to what's going on around them and suggest useful information.'

'Somebody introduces themselves to you, and your watch goes to your web page,' said Page. 'Or if you met this person two years ago, this is what they said to you... Eventually you'll have the implant, where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the answer."





Ever since I became a more active user of the internet, I have been in an almost constant state of awe. There are so many useful things to use and revisit but that expanse of utility is a double-edged sword in its ability to make me forget that I even have certain tools to use. I definitely have to agree with Ryland about how our minds are chewing up information all the time. At the same time, so many people take it for granted. Somebody wonders something aloud during a conversation yet doesn't make a move to google it with their pocket computers. Drives me crazy.
Although I don't think I would have been more inclined to read a wall of text, the power of the scroll bar is so enabling. I can look for a tl;dr if I want it short and sweet. I don't like calling them generational differences because it only feeds the trolls and hipsters(not necessarily bad members of a community) who would like no more than to say that the quality of humans has degraded overnight. People of other times would have been just as likely to drop their books and head for a shining LED screen.
The future is scary because we've all been focusing on all the bad the tech industry is capable of but consider also the improved utility. Look at this video of a near future. It's a good'n. KTHXBAI. Gonna go look at funny cat pix.

Wachagonnado about it?

This video is like a crystal ball in its high resolution and foresight.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Notes on Hamlet

At the beginning of the play, I thought I would be bored.  I guess wasn't really that interested in knowing what it was about and it doesn't have the same fame as Romeo and Juliet.  What I thought I knew was that Hamlet goes crazy.  Now (and I should have assumed this), I see that Shakespeare created an uncommon depth to the eponymous character.  Not only is he an honorable, moral-led character but also a rightfully conniving personality.  Also, the plot was much more interesting to follow than what I had initially assumed, crazy prince goes ham on e'rybody he knows.  From here, I know there has to be a good twist coming because the plot is so sturdily set.

Who Was Shakespeare?

William Shakespeare was born in 1564, probably on April 22 or 23 and died April 23, 1616. He was married at 18 to Anne Hathaway.  He had two daughters, Susanna and Judeth, and a son, Hamnet, who died at 11.  The first work with his name on it was Love's Labours's Lost. He had written other works and dedicated them to aristocracy who would get them published, albeit, under somebody else's name.  Clearly, this is just asking for illegitimacy claims.
People don't like Shakespeare and I think it's because they don't get it.  They're is so much more to his work than meets the eye.  Most students probably aren't told how intricately his syllables are placed so they can't see his genius.  Also, it isn't the most modern English so many of us can get lost in the archaic words.  Lots of it can be understood with knowledge of another language and a scholastic vocabulary but, here in America, neither of those are very common.  I was dumbstruck when I first learned how he wrote.  I was also intense in my attention to his words.  Now, it takes less effort to understand his message.  Whether that is due to a grown vocabulary or simply experience is unclear.  Probably a mixture of the two.  Still, the symbolism can sometimes whoosh right over my head. " Get thee to a nunnery," though, that's wicked harsh but I truly lol'd.

To Facebook or Not to Facebook

When I first got an account on Facebook, I was childish.  The reason I signed up at all was because everybody else had one and I thought I should do it to remain at speed with my peers.  I first got there and the most common thing to do was find funny pages to like.  The benefits of having one were that I could talk to my peers online even though we could talk through text and collaboration on homework projects.  I've never found a group that actually did their work while on Facebook.
The benefit of sharing a name with a popular character is that my name doesn't get flung up on to the screen when you search it.  It's the same letters but really, they're not looking for me.  The risk of Facebook still exists, however, because I show my life on there (not that I've updated recently).
After having read the article, I have raised the wool from over my eyes.  I won't be thinking like a sheep in a flock believing that a big company can't do bad because that's argumentum ad hominem.  They just want the money and they know that kids will continue to use it as long as it stays relevant.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

WUBWUBWUBWUBWUB: A Hamlet Remix

Hold on to your wayfarers guys, cuz I'm  'bout to take it back!

I wanna kiiiiiillll Claudius
And it's not just because.
These actors are the real test.
And vengeance is my cause!
I'll keep my eyes glued upon the man
See the emotions he tries to hide
I'll use this play to understand
The guilt that is inside!

Treachery! Gotta watch it all!
It's not just me.
Got a few of my best buddies!

Treachery! Ohhh, just one life to end
A monarchy to defeeeeennd!

Treachery! Gotta watch it all!
Are my suspicions truuuuue?
In his ears, you poured poison through?

Kill my dad and I'll kill you!
Treacheryyyyy!

Gotta end it all! Gonna make you fall!
Treachery!

YEEEEEeeeeeaaaaahhh...

Based on one of my generation's anthems: Try not to headbang too hard.

Midterm Autopsy

Cause of death: word-bank and process of elimination
Had the midterm been given as a "give a definition" quiz, I would have whimpered as the BS flowed from my pen.  Frank, I know, but it needs to be admitted.  Next time, I'll get down to business and defeat the Huns.  For the time being, I'm happy considering the studying I did did not merit the grade I got.  I guess that's just the way the ball bounces, the cookie crumbles, the mop flops. *keels over in self-loathing laughter*

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Something's Cray in the State of Denmark


Dear O,
    Although this impasse you've arrived at may make you lugubrious, I recommend you show some bravado.    You are a strong, independent woman.  Unless the monarchy experiences some kind of metamorphosis, you will see that Hamlet cannot be quixotic because the punctilios of royal relationships are sine qua non to his duties.  He would be an apostate to ignore your father. The fact is that your family will not reach a consensus with you and your love's feelings. It will always be a dichotomy. I'm just bein' real.
#soothsayer

Don't Wanna Say I Told Me So But...

I told me so.   I worried the night before because I was resting up this week for the SAT on Saturday aka not studying for the midterm.  I assumed I would do fine without the studying.  Still, I'm sure if it had been anything but multiple choice I would have regretted it more.  But the stars aligned for me on Friday.  I lost my glasses that morning and feared a repeat of one such time in sophomore year when I couldn't see the words.  However, mine eyes didn't deceive me.  I knew almost all the words and the ones I didn't I answered through the process of elimination.
    Some people like to hate on multiple-choice tests because you don't remember a lot of the stuff but I always learn after I take tests.  When I cram, I learn details.  I came across this ability on the Friday mornings before AP World History in sophomore year.  I grabbed the text book and scanned for new info on the way to school.  I'm not an actor working for Bosley Hair Solutions so I'm not gonna say "If it works for me, it can work for you."  It might.  Who knows? But I don't recommend it. On the other hand, the SAT taught me that modern air conditioning was invented in 1902.
   Next time, I will be able to recite the definitions so I'm not surprised by a more challenging format of the test.  Also, I learned that accoutrements can be spelled accouterments *shivers*.  It's gross but it's allowed.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Papa. Don't Preach. And I'm Keeping My Baby.

 That is, if my baby were my favorite way to study for vocabulary tests then I would be sticking with it.  I plan on looking at all the words, tracing my finger down each list while sitting next to the computer so I can immediately look up the ones I don't know and find sentences they belong in.
   And I'm not gonna lie.  If I do well on this test, all my grade are belong to Michelle Arriaga...probably.    That quizlet page she has going on is wicked useful.

No Patience from Mr. Nice Guy

I sent the creators of two of these sources an email but I have no idea how valid those addresses were and they haven't replied.*has only waited one day*. Sorry morals but my grades win today.

Behind curtain number one we have a lovely lesson plan from a teacher who really seems to have the right idea about analyzing Hamlet: Clickety-click #1

Curtain number two hides a hotlist of Shakespearean links to bring flavor to any of William's works(if you need it.):Clickety-click #2

Last, but not least, curtain number three reveals a place that could be so helpful if you made an honest attempt and followed the rules of Howard Rheingold.  Honestly, while I was reading his how-to on web convos, I thought the creators of Reddit must have used it as a bible:Clickety-click #3